Nanny mauled by two dogs protecting employer’s son sues

A nanny has sued an American couple after she was violently attacked and seriously wounded by two English bulldogs. FILE PHOTO | FOTOSEARCH

A nanny has sued an American couple seeking more than Sh235 million compensation after she was violently attacked and seriously wounded by two English bulldogs two years ago while taking her employer’s son for a play date in Karen.

In the petition filed at the High Court, Ms Colletta Sebby Abonyo accuses Mr Gabriel Oser and Ms Joanna Block of negligence after the couple’s two dogs viciously attacked her on April 28, 2021.

Also read: Risks for employers sacking ‘poor performers’

Evidence tabled in court shows that Ms Abonyo had taken her employer’s nine-year-old son for a play date with the couple’s son but encountered the two mongrels at the compound attacking her as she protected the minor.

She says in the court documents that she underwent two surgeries as the dogs punctured her face, causing deep lacerations and tore chunks of flesh from her body during the attack.

The woman says the change in her appearance has had an adverse effect on her self-esteem, inherent dignity, quality of life, social and leisure activities, and has the potential to impact her chances of entering into and maintaining relationships of a personal and romantic nature.

“The facial scarring and mental anguish have diminished the plaintiff’s quality of life which has made her performance of everyday tasks more challenging. Additionally, they have led to the loss of congenial employment, the loss of pride and pleasure in her work,” Ms Abonyo says in the court documents.

The nanny is seeking general damages for suffering, physical impairment, emotional distress and loss of amenity amounting to Sh225 million, and a further Sh10 million for future medical expenses.

She is accusing the couple of violating her rights to human dignity and the right not to be treated in a cruel, inhuman and degrading manner.

Through the law firm of Anjarwalla & Khanna LLP, the woman says she was employed by another couple as the primary caregiver of their son.

On the fateful day, the boy had a play date with the couple’s son and after a short walk to the home in Hardy, Karen, they knocked at the gate and workers opened it for them.

But on entering the compound, one of the dogs charged at the minor and she instinctively lifted him up to protect the minor from harm.

The dog lunged at her biting her legs and the mongrel was soon joined by a second one.

The dogs then forced her to the ground as she held on to the boy tightly and after being saved by the couple’s gardener, she had a deep wound in her face, legs and ears.

She called her employer immediately and was rushed to Nairobi Hospital Annex at Galleria Mall for treatment but due to the severity of the injuries, she was referred to the main hospital.

Ms Abonyo was later treated by a maxillofacial surgeon- Dr Tilman Stasch- at his private clinic, who apparently spent between two to three hours debriding all the wounds and stitching her cheek and reattaching flesh that had been torn away.

“The pain was so severe that the plaintiff was unable to sleep and was visibly and audibly distressed that her young children with whom she lives, expressed to the plaintiff their fear that she would not survive the injuries,” she says in the court papers.

On subsequent check-ups, she was referred to Aga Khan University Hospital where she was hospitalised for eight nights as she underwent two surgeries.

Some of the wounds, she said, required grafting and resulted in disfigurement including in her face.

The couple later indicated that they would euthanise the dogs. The woman says the couple owed the duty of care to provide a safe environment to her and the minor upon entering the compound.

She says the couple ought to have known that the dogs were violent and aggressive and could harm visitors if left unleashed but they left it unattended, exposing her and the minor to harm.

“Therefore, the defendants ought to have made arrangements to ensure that the dogs were restrained for the period of (the minor) and the plaintiff’s visit to the defendants’ premises, more so because they invited (the minor) and the plaintiff onto their premises and took responsibility for their safety,” she says.

Also read: What CAS ruling means for President Ruto

In addition to the physical harm, Ms Abonyo says she also endured a traumatic experience, which resulted in extreme psychological and emotional distress.

The trauma, according to a consultant psychologist, manifests itself as flashbacks of the attack, nightmares of being chased by dogs, phobia of dogs, fear of sleeping alone and persistent headaches, among others.

She says she experienced loss of amenity due to the facial disfigurement and scarring, sustained from the dog attack.

She says her physical appearance has lowered her self-esteem in her own eyes resulting in severe depression and fear of socializing and travelling, which were among her hobbies.

The defendants, she says, had pledged to pay her medical expenses that totalled Sh1.29 million but they had only paid Sh1.065 million by the time she filed the case.

→ [email protected]